This TED talk by Rory Stewart a British MP explains why he believes it is time for other countries to get out of Afghanistan.
Showing posts with label TED talks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TED talks. Show all posts
Sunday, September 11, 2011
British MP says its time to get out of Afghanistan
This TED talk by Rory Stewart a British MP explains why he believes it is time for other countries to get out of Afghanistan.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Julian Assange and Wikileaks
Given the current information suggesting that 4 Canadians were killed by friendly fire that has come out of Wikileaks, I thought you might like to meet the founder of Wikileaks and hear from him directly in his recent TED talk. My personal position is that our governments should never withhold from us their actions that would be contrary to our laws or our societal values. Governments should not have the power to act in a manner contrary to our societal beliefs. I, of course, understand that there are real reasons for secrecy but if that is to protect the reputation of the powerful - I am all for their exposure.
***As always, though, raw data must be evaluated as it can be as false as any other report!
***As always, though, raw data must be evaluated as it can be as false as any other report!
Labels:
Julian Assange,
Oh Canadians,
TED talks,
Wikileaks
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Refrigeration without Electricity
This talk by TEDster Adam Grosser discusses new work on refrigeration without electricity to address problems in the developing world. It erroneously says that a "Crazy Canadian" named Powel Crosely patented an early device but the real inventor was David Forbes Keith of Toronto, Ontario, Canada who filed the patent in 1927 and it was granted in 1929. That device had the danger of exploding and so the more recent work is safer. Please see the 6 minute talk about this hopeful project which is posted below.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Canada's Need for Energy
Recently, I was invited to participate in a focus group for the Ontario Power Generation Corporation. I learned a lot and it was a great experience. The group that I was in was asked to evaluate written materials that stated the stance and advocacy positions of the OPG. Some pertained to labour and investment in the province, some to green initiatives, and some seemed like advertising copy. Nuclear and renewable energy were a big part of what we were considering in this focus group. When we evaluated the need for power, the problems of pollution, the potential need for electricity in the future, I started to wonder if nuclear power might not be the way to go.
The debate that I posted from the TED talks, below, was a thought provoking experience but it was something else that helped me decide against nuclear power. The event that solidified my thinking was the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Why?
In reality, we all participated in or allowed the exploration and capturing of oil from the ocean floor to fuel our way of life. On some level we all knew that in spite of what they said, there was no way that the oil industry could really deal with the worst case scenario but we minimized the risks. We turned into the 'see no evil' monkeys. We ignored the warnings. BP could not deal with the oil spill. It cannot now, no matter what it does, restore that part of our planet. They cannot undo the wound to the planet, to the health of the ocean and to the people who encounter it or to the local economy. They cannot unkill the dead ocean life. We need to remember that this did not just happen in and to the Gulf of Mexico. In a closed system, like the planet we live on, the ramifications are world wide. The oil industry simply played dice with our home and they lost but in the end we all lost.
It is the same with nuclear energy. We cannot, as a planet, handle the worst case scenario with nuclear power generation. If an accident occurs, the people who profit from it, will not be able to 'fix' it. People who have no part in the profit or even the benefits will play with their health or their lives. If a terrorist decides to target it, all we need is one lapse in vigilance, one human error and the corridor to destruction is opened. The facts of human nature and of a science called Human Factors argues persuasively against such eternal vigilance. We are all paying the price for the mistakes of the past in terms of cancer rates and deaths of innocents. It is time to say 'NO' to technologies and to power generation sources where we cannot handle the worst case scenarios. Especially when we have such benign sources of power waiting in the wings.
Worst case scenarios do happen on this small planet.
The debate that I posted from the TED talks, below, was a thought provoking experience but it was something else that helped me decide against nuclear power. The event that solidified my thinking was the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Why?
In reality, we all participated in or allowed the exploration and capturing of oil from the ocean floor to fuel our way of life. On some level we all knew that in spite of what they said, there was no way that the oil industry could really deal with the worst case scenario but we minimized the risks. We turned into the 'see no evil' monkeys. We ignored the warnings. BP could not deal with the oil spill. It cannot now, no matter what it does, restore that part of our planet. They cannot undo the wound to the planet, to the health of the ocean and to the people who encounter it or to the local economy. They cannot unkill the dead ocean life. We need to remember that this did not just happen in and to the Gulf of Mexico. In a closed system, like the planet we live on, the ramifications are world wide. The oil industry simply played dice with our home and they lost but in the end we all lost.
It is the same with nuclear energy. We cannot, as a planet, handle the worst case scenario with nuclear power generation. If an accident occurs, the people who profit from it, will not be able to 'fix' it. People who have no part in the profit or even the benefits will play with their health or their lives. If a terrorist decides to target it, all we need is one lapse in vigilance, one human error and the corridor to destruction is opened. The facts of human nature and of a science called Human Factors argues persuasively against such eternal vigilance. We are all paying the price for the mistakes of the past in terms of cancer rates and deaths of innocents. It is time to say 'NO' to technologies and to power generation sources where we cannot handle the worst case scenarios. Especially when we have such benign sources of power waiting in the wings.
Worst case scenarios do happen on this small planet.
Labels:
nuclear energy debate,
Oh Canadians,
TED talks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)